# Cyclotomic Fields and Zeta Values by John Coates, R. Sujatha By John Coates, R. Sujatha

Written by means of prime employees within the box, this short yet stylish ebook offers in complete element the easiest facts of the "main conjecture" for cyclotomic fields. Its motivation stems not just from the inherent great thing about the topic, but in addition from the broader mathematics curiosity of those questions.
From the experiences: "The textual content is written in a transparent and tasty variety, with adequate clarification supporting the reader orientate in the middle of technical details." --ZENTRALBLATT MATH

Similar number theory books

Number Theory 1: Fermat's Dream

This is often the English translation of the unique eastern booklet. during this quantity, "Fermat's Dream", middle theories in smooth quantity thought are brought. advancements are given in elliptic curves, $p$-adic numbers, the $\zeta$-function, and the quantity fields. This paintings provides a sublime viewpoint at the ask yourself of numbers.

Initial-Boundary Value Problems and the Navier-Stokes Equations

This publication offers an advent to the monstrous topic of preliminary and initial-boundary price difficulties for PDEs, with an emphasis on functions to parabolic and hyperbolic platforms. The Navier-Stokes equations for compressible and incompressible flows are taken to illustrate to demonstrate the consequences.

Additional info for Cyclotomic Fields and Zeta Values

Example text

We denote by Un1 the subgroup {x ∈ Un : x ≡ 1 mod pn }. More generally, if Z is any subgroup of Un , we write Z 1 = Z ∩ Un1 . 4 Iwasawa’s Theorem 53 Note that the index of Z 1 in Z always divides p − 1, because Z 1 is the kernel of the reduction map from Z into F× p . In particular, this index 1 1 is prime to p. Also, note that Un and Un are now Zp -modules, whereas this is plainly not true for Un and Un themselves. 9) taken with respect to the norm maps. Since Un1 and Cn1 are compact 1 and C 1 .

12). 2. For all k ≥ 1, and all u in U∞ , we have G ˜ χ(g)k dL(u) = (1 − pk−1 )δk (u). 12) Proof. 10) gives G χ(g)k dλ = Z× p xk d(χ(λ)). ˜ Also, via our identiﬁcation of Λ(Z× p ) with a subset of Λ(Zp ), the integral above on the right has the same value if we integrate over the whole ˜ ˜ of Zp . Now take λ = L(u), so that, by deﬁnition, we have χ( ˜ L(u)) = Υ(L(fu )), where we recall that L(fu )(T ) = fu (T )p 1 . 12) is equal to Dk−1 (hu (T ) − ϕ(hu )(T )) T =0 , where hu (T ) = (1 + T ) fu (T ) .

Let f be in W . Recalling that ϕ(f )(T ) = f ((1 + T )p − 1) and applying ∆ to the equation f (ξ(1 + T ) − 1), ϕ(f ) = ξ∈µp we obtain immediately that ψ(∆(f )) = ∆(f ). The ﬁnal assertion of the lemma is obvious. In fact, the following stronger result is true, but its proof is subtle and non-trivial. 6. We have ∆(W ) = Rψ=1 . The strategy of the proof is to use reduction modulo p. 9) and let x → x be the reduction map. If Y is any subset of R, then we denote by Y its image in Ω under the reduction map.