By Kaaryn S. Gustafson
During the last 3 a long time, welfare regulations were trained by means of well known ideals that welfare fraud is rampant. for that reason, welfare rules became extra punitive and the bounds among the welfare method and the felony justice method have blurred--so a lot in order that in a few locales prosecution caseloads for welfare fraud exceed welfare caseloads. actually, a few recipients manage the welfare process for his or her personal ends, others are gravely harm through punitive rules, and nonetheless others fall someplace in between.In dishonest Welfare, Kaaryn S. Gustafson endeavors to resolve those grey components through delivering insights into the historical past, social building, and lived adventure of welfare. She exhibits why dishonest is all yet inevitable--not simply because bad everyone is immoral, yet simply because traditional participants navigating complicated platforms of ideas are inclined to turn into entangled regardless of their top efforts. via an exam of the development of the crime we all know as welfare fraud, which she bases on in-depth interviews with welfare recipients in Northern California, Gustafson demanding situations readers to question their assumptions approximately welfare regulations, welfare recipients, and crime regulate within the usa.
Read or Download Cheating Welfare: Public Assistance and the Criminalization of Poverty PDF
Similar poverty books
A raucous, truth-telling examine the white operating poor-and why they hate liberalism.
Deer searching with Jesus is internet columnist Joe Bageant’s document on what he realized whilst he moved again to his homeland of Winchester, Virginia, which-like numerous American small towns-is quick turning into the bedrock of an enduring underclass. via turns brutal, gentle, incendiary, and heavily humorous, this publication is a choice to palms for fellow progressives with little genuine knowing of "the nice beery, NASCAR-loving, church-going, gun-owning the US that hasn't ever set foot in a Starbucks. "
In view that its inception in 1965, America's professional poverty expense (OPR) has been the one most crucial statistic utilized by policymakers and anxious electorate to judge good fortune or failure within the nation's ongoing fight opposed to fabric want. yet in a severe new exam of this commonly degree, Nicholas Eberstadt fees that the OPR is, in fact, 'a damaged compass'_a improper index producing more and more deceptive numbers approximately poverty within the usa.
This publication is the 1st background of the area foodstuff Programme, the nutrients reduction arm of the United countries. It tells the tale of the expansion of WFP from modest beginings as a three-year test in 1963-65 to its present position because the major resource of foreign meals relief for either catastrophe aid and improvement opposed to the heritage of the evolution and improvement of meals reduction.
Poverty is an instructional factor since it impacts kid's actual, emotional, and cognitive improvement. specifically in present instances, taken-for-granted principles approximately poverty and bad kids needs to be scrutinized and reconsidered. that's the objective of this publication. Poverty and education within the U. S. : Contexts and results is partially a plea for educators and destiny educators to adopt the highbrow and emotional paintings of studying extra in regards to the social factors, in addition to the occasionally life-altering outcomes of poverty.
- The White Man’s World
- The Transformation of Plantation Politics: Black Politics, Concentrated Poverty, and Social Capital in the Mississippi Delta
- From the Local to the Global: Key Issues in Development Studies (2nd Edition)
- On the bowery: confronting homelessness in American society
- $2.00 A Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America
- Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict: A Critical “Development” Reader
Additional resources for Cheating Welfare: Public Assistance and the Criminalization of Poverty
According to prosecutors, Woods fraudulently collected $377,458 in wel Reconstructing Social Illsâ•… |â•… 35 fare fraud between 1974 and 1980 (New York Times, March 17, 1983a). The media dubbed Woods—who possessed a Rolls Royce, a Mercedes Benz, and a Cadillac and who lived in a large house with a pool—the “Welfare Queen” (New York Times, December 21, 1980). Rather than treating the three welfare fraud cases of Linda Taylor, Barbara Jean Williams, and Dorothy Woods as the exceptional instances of criminal activity they were, politicians—and the media and public as well—adopted these cases as typifying poor, African American women on welfare.
In many of those cases, though, the men, not the women, were charged with fraud. Men found residing with women receiving welfare aid were treated as the welfare cheats. The prosecutions of men, rather than women, suggest that the welfare and law enforcement officials considered women to be easily manipulated by the men but ultimately blameless in the cheating (Neubeck Reconstructing Social Illsâ•… |â•… 21 and Cazenave 2001, 102). This view of the innocence of women, however, would change over time.
Not all of the Supreme Court decisions, however, favored welfare recipients. While the procedural rationality of AFDC was stepped up, the substantive foundations of the welfare program remained in question. ” In fact, the Supreme Court ruled that states possessed the authority to cut welfare benefits and to set maximum aid payment levels even when those levels would leave families with unmet needs (Rosado v. Wyman (1970); Dandridge v. Williams (1970)). Moreover, the Supreme Court rejected arguments that programmatic distinctions between categories of the poor—specifically those that provided higher ben30â•… |â•… Reconstructing Social Ills efits to the white and elderly and lower benefits to the black and young— amounted to invidious discrimination (Jefferson v.