Changing Transatlantic Security Relations: Do the U.S, the by Jan Hallenberg, Håkan Karlsson

By Jan Hallenberg, Håkan Karlsson

This new e-book exhibits how the proposal of a strategic triangle can light up the protection relationships one of the usa, the eu Union and Russia within the higher transatlantic sphere.

This proposal highlights how the relationships between those 3 actors may perhaps, on a few matters, be heavily similar. A valuable query additionally follows without delay from using the idea of the triangle: does the ecu have actor power during this coverage sphere or will it get it sooner or later? the explanation this is often so very important for our undertaking is that provided that the Union is appeared by means of the 2 different actors, and regards itself, as an actor in protection coverage does the strategic triangle fairly exists. as a result, this publication has a powerful concentration upon the advance of the actor power of the Union. relating to the United States, it examines to what quantity the concept that of the strategic triangle has importance less than every one of 5 grand thoughts that function substitute visions of the superpower’s position on the earth.

Show description

Read or Download Changing Transatlantic Security Relations: Do the U.S, the EU and Russia Form a New Strategic Triangle? PDF

Similar political freedom books

Transferring Army BRAC Lands Containing Unexploded Ordnance: Lessons Learned and Future Options

Identifies and assesses stumbling blocks to taking out extra military lands that comprise unexploded ordnance, and identifies unnovative techniques for the disposal of those lands.

Security Manual

''Security Manual'' presents useful information on all facets of safety paintings and is a prepared made resource of data for all participants of the safety career, together with managers, supervisors and running shoes. This 8th variation has been totally restructured to higher mirror fresh adjustments within the felony legislation, fireplace security and defense practices.

The choice of war: the Iraq War and the just war tradition

This well timed research of President George W. Bush's international coverage offers with the cornerstone of his administrations—the "war on terror"—as applied in Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and at Abu Ghraib legal. the alternative of battle: The Iraq warfare and the "Just battle" culture discusses NSS 2002, the nationwide safety assertion that grew to become the blueprint for the Bush Doctrine.

Israel and the Palestinian Refugees

This publication deals diversified views at the Palestinian refugee challenge and the prospective how one can facilitate its solution. It comprises contributions of Israeli, Palestinian and different students, and its major target is to begin an educated discussion that would bridge the "knowledge hole" among different camps.

Extra resources for Changing Transatlantic Security Relations: Do the U.S, the EU and Russia Form a New Strategic Triangle?

Example text

It could be argued that an initial incentive to do so was the unfinished US ratification process regarding NATO accession. Others, though, argued that the experience of postcommunist societies is different from that of Western Europe in that many believe the defence of liberty may require sacrifices. Despite ambivalence among the population as to the rightfulness and effectiveness of military intervention as a tool, some new member states – notably Poland – assumed important commitments in Afghanistan as well as in Iraq.

We would argue that, at the very least, such sweeping assertions regarding the repercussions of eastwards enlargement warrant serious scrutiny. New members bring new capacity to the EU in part by adding areas of interest, history, geography, natural resources, population, economic assets, environmental problems, cultural values and political positions. However, they also contribute with their own skills and networks of external relations and diplomatic legacies, traditional bilateral ties and other constellations.

Also, the clause indicates that the Union, due to its transnational character, is able to think about transboundary threats in a way that is difficult for nation-states. It states that the Union shall mobilize all the instruments at its disposal, including military resources, in order to: prevent terrorist threats; protect democratic institutions and civilians from terrorist attacks; on request, assist member states on their own territories in the event of a terrorist attack. To that end member states need to coordinate their actions in the Council.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.73 of 5 – based on 30 votes